Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Role of Distance Education to Impart Higher Education in Assam: A case study of IDOL (Gauhati University) in Sonitpur District

Role of Distance Education to Impart the Higher Education in Assam
A case study of IDOL (Gauhati University) in Sonitpur District

Dr. Manoj Kumar Hazarika, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce,
Ms. Daisy Rani Kalita, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics,
 Darrang College, Tezpur



Abstract:
Overall development and growth of a nation is based on educational system of the nation. Higher education imparts in-depth knowledge and understanding to expose new edge of knowledge in different fields. It plays a key role to human resource development (HRD) of a nation. In present competitive world only the higher education provides qualified and trained human resource to keep pace with the fast changing world. The higher education scenario in India is below the expectation and always creates to a pressure on the government to establish more and more colleges and universities. Distance and open learning is an alternative to overcome the public demand and it is a massive way to reach the un-reach. The main objective of the paper is to analyse the role of distance education to impart the higher education in Sonitpur district in particular and in Assam in general. Implementation of semester system in under graduate level in Assam creates several problems such as a huge enrollment pressure, maintenance student-teacher ratio, physical-infrastructure etc. Introduction of distance and open learning system with various tools like counseling programmes, on-line class room facilities, comprehensive study-materials etc, makes the education system cost effective and provides education in the door steps of the stakeholders.


Key-words
: Higher Education, Distance Education, IDOL



Introduction:
Overall development and growth of a nation is based on its educational system and it shows the true picture of the people of the nation. Higher education imparts in-depth knowledge and understanding to expose new edge of knowledge in different fields of commerce, economics, science and technology etc. It helps to develop confidence in individual as well as community about their own ability and inherent strengths, which helps to shape their lives and fights against oppression, exclusion, discrimination, corruption etc. It is the key to human resource development (HRD) of the nation. In present competitive world, only the higher education provides qualified and trained human resource to keep pace with the fast changing world. If we look to the history of India, education was never in reach of its entire people of the country. Unequal access to education has been rampant in India. There are serious problems of gender, regional, sectoral and caste disparities. A significant number of children continue to drop out due to socio-economic and cultural factors and lack of adequate infrastructure. It is not easy to overcome the situation by establishing new educational institutions, since the establishment cost is very high. Distance and open learning is an alternative way to overcome the public demand for higher education and it is a massive way to reach the un-reach. Distance education plays a crucial role in the economic development of a nation by providing human resource as per the requirement. This system of education can cater education to all without any barrier. 


Conceptual Framework of Distance Education:
The term Distance Education has been applied to a tremendous variety of programmes serving numerous audiences via a wide variety of media. American Council of Education (ACE) defined Distance Education as a system and a process of connecting learners with distributed learning resources.
Desmond Keegan (1995) provides another definition.   He states that distance education and training result from the technological separation of teacher and learner which frees the student from the necessity of traveling to “a fixed place, at a fixed time, to meet a fixed person, in order to be trained” (p. 7). 
Greenberg (1998) defines contemporary distance learning as “a planned teaching/learning experience that uses a wide spectrum of technologies to reach learners at a distance and is designed to encourage learner interaction and certification of learning” (p. 36). 
Teaster and Blieszner (1999) say “the term distance learning has been applied to many instructional methods: however, its primary distinction is that the teacher and the learner are separate in space and possibly time” (p. 741). 
However, distance learning is not a new phenomenon. The history of distance education could be traced back to the early 1700s in the form of correspondence education, but technology-based distance education might be best linked to the introduction of audiovisual devices into the schools in the early 1900s. With the development of the postal service in the 19th century, commercial correspondence colleges provided distance education to students across the country. This trend continued well into the 20th century with the advent of radio, television, and other media that allowed learning from distance. In the last decade, distance education has changed significantly with the use of computer-mediated learning, two-way interactive video, and a variety of other technologies. Colleges and universities are forging ahead to provide learning at a distance, and many institutions are making substantial investments in new technologies for teaching.

Historical Background of Distance Education in India:
Starting from the ancient time, Indian educational system was not able to provide educational facilities to the all section of the society. Indian society is a hierarchical society and its knowledge base has always been elitist (discriminatory). It covered a group of people mainly of the royal families and high class community. Legendary, “Ekalavya” of the Mahabharata is the best example of this educational system prevailing in ancient India. Since, he was not a ‘Khatriya’ , he was deprived from formal education directly of his Guru, Drunaswarjya and hence he had his education trough distance education.
The role of distance education in promoting higher education in India is reflected in the report of the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE)  set up under the chairmanship of Dr. D.S. Kothari in 1961. The committee advised on the direction, growth and development of distance education in India to impart higher education through two types of institutions viz. Correspondence Course Institutes attached to the conventional universities and the Open University.
The University of Delhi was the pioneer in starting correspondence courses through School of Correspondence Course in 1962. In 1964, the Education Commission, Govt. of India strongly advocated the promotion of correspondence education. Punjabi University, Patiala was the second university to launch correspondence courses through its Directorate of Correspondence Course (DCC) and the first university to introduce regional medium of instruction in 1968.  In subsequent years the number of CCIs increased rapidly and in mid 1998, there were 61 CCIs attached to different Universities ( Association of Indian University, 1998) These collectively offered a great variety of post-graduate, under-graduate, diploma and certificate programmes and catered to the needs of about 6,00,000 students. 

There are some drawbacks in academic, administrative and information services of Correspondence institutions in India. By the end of the sixties an idea of starting an open university in India was discussed. A working group constituted in 1971 under the chairmanship of G. Partasarthy recommended to the government the establishment of an open university so that students from the remotest parts of the country could have access to education and obtain degree equivalent to those awarded by the university located in urban centres. In 1982, the UGC pointed out the need to establish a National Open University. In the same year the government of Andhra Pradesh established the first Indian Open University at Hyderabad. It was subsequently redesignated as the Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Open University (BRAOU). The encouraging start of the BRAOU gave an impetus (force) to the idea of having an open learning system for the country. It led to the establishment of the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) in 1985.
 Subsequently, the Distance Education Council (DEC) was formed to develop guidelines for extending support to the state open university, identified a common pool of courses and programmes that could be shared by the open universities. DEC also starts giving grants for research in open and distance education. It has also established a quality assurance panel and developed criteria and tools for evaluation of performance and consequent accreditation.

Statement of Research Problem: (Higher Education Scenario in India)
The higher education scenario in India is below the expectation and always creates a pressure on the government to establish more and more colleges and universities. As per the Reports of CIA World Factbook only 12.4 percent of the relevant age group, i.e. 18-23 is accessible to higher education whereas in develop economies it is 47 percent and in medium age, it is just 26.2 percent while the world rate is more than 28 percent. The literacy rate of India is 74.4 percent (as per Census 2011) while the world literacy rate is 82 percent. (www.ugc.ac.in/pub/heidia.pdf). Moreover, as per the National Family Health Survey finding of 1998-99, more than one-third of the total populations in India are illiterate out of which only less than 19 percent were just literate with no formal primary schooling. In rural India, the higher educated populations consist of less than 5 percent of the total population. A low percentage of participation in higher education as well as low literacy rate is a serious problem for a democratic country like India. The total sex literacy rate in India is also not satisfactory, the trend between 1981 and 2011 are as follows:
Table-1
 Sex Literacy Rate in India (1981-2011)
Particulars
1981
1991
2001
2011
Male
56.37
64.13
75.85
82.14
Female
29.75
39.29
54.16
65.46
Total
43.56
52.20
65.38
74.4
Divergence
(Male-Female)
26.62
24.84
21.69
16.68
Source: Census of India
With more than 20,000 colleges, 400 universities and  65 years experience after independence, India is able to ensure just 12.4% participation in higher education. To put differently, to increase the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) to 15% i.e. 2.94 million students by 2015, India must establish about 1,400 colleges and 28 conventional universities each year. In this regard, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar recognized the importance of education in shaping the future and cautioned the under-privileged not to lose any opportunity to get the right to education. But, after 65 years of its implementation, India could not succeed in providing access to the ‘right to education’ to its people in the true sense.

Need for the study:
Education is inevitable for Human resource development and then national development. However, in most of the developing countries, due to the limitation of resources it is almost impossible to educate all of their citizens through on-campus teaching. Huge amount of money is warranted to establish the infrastructure for     on-campus teaching which is out of the reach of the developing countries. Therefore, to educate their huge population the developing countries are to depend on open learning and distance education system.
The main advantage of open education system is its flexibility. The flexibility in terms of time, pace, place, age, occupation certainly gives a great scope to thousands of learners who are the victims of the Indian rigid conventional education system. Since the Open University is a learner-centered system; it provides education to large and diverse groups of students in a flexible manner. As far as the qualifications are concerned most of the learners who couldn’t able to continue their education in the formal system, because of socio-economic and cultural reasons have the advantage of open learning.
Further the flexibility of entry into academic programmes irrespective of their age, qualifying makes the learners can pursue their higher education. The flexibility in teaching and learning process is also an additional advantage for the learners. Since open learning system in India adopts multi-media approach learner can study the course material, watch audio visual programmes related to their courses in his own pace and place. To seek further help or information they can attend the counseling sessions in nearby study centers during the weekends. This facility helps the learners who mostly busy with earning their livelihoods. The examination and evaluation system also gives greater flexibility for the learners. Thus the Open University system in India comes in to existence with a popular slogan “Education at your door step”.
Second important advantage of this open learning system in India is its Cost effectiveness. Education in the Open University is cost effective not only to the students but also to the institution. A student can gain while he is earning and learn according to his convenience and interest. Geographical distance is another advantage of distance learning which not only saves travelling expenses but also time.

Objective of the paper:
The main objective of the paper is to analyse the role of distance education to impart the higher education in Sonitpur district in particular and in Assam in general.
The paper aims to identify the barriers to the development of Distance and Open learning system in Assam and recommend possible alternatives to be followed to overcome the barriers. 

Methodology:
Following methodologies are used in the study:
(i) Sample size: Sonitpur District of Assam has been covered under the universe of the study. 30 learners of IDOL about 10 percent of the total successful (pass out) learners from 2005 to 2011 of Sonitpur District are selected on random and convenience sampling method, irrespective of their age, caste and occupation.



(ii) Data Collection:
Data for the study are collected from the two sources:
Primary Source:  The primary data are obtained through personal interview and questionnaire administrated to sample learners.
Secondary Source: The secondary data are collected from IDOL Centre, Darrang College, Tezpur; University News, various research papers, books and websites. The secondary data are used to establish the authenticity of the study.

(iii) Data Analysis: The collected primary and secondary data were analysed by using suitable statistical tools like tabulation, percentage and mean.

Paper Design:
The paper is divided into three parts. The first part discusses the conceptual framework and historical background of the subject, ‘Distance Education’ and its importance. The second part deals with the case study of IDOL (Institute of Distance and Open Learning, Gauhati University) in the district. And the third part represents the findings, recommendations and conclusion.

A Case study:  
Institute of Distance and Open Learning (IDOL)
The IDOL, formerly known as Post Graduate Correspondence School (PGCS) was established in May 1998 with the objective to ensure the opportunity to pursue quality higher education to the large number of students who could not pursue higher education through conventional mode of education. Starting with 514 students and 6 courses in May 1998, IDOL now witnesses its growth in all capacities with an enrolment of more than 15,000 students and 25 programmes in a learning environment equipped with latest technology. IDOL is the only institution in the country to offer Post Graduate courses in 5 schedule languages viz. Assamese, Bengali, Nepali, Bodo and English. The IDOL has started a new under-graduate course i.e. B.A., Pass course, CTS (Credit Transfer Scheme) for those learners who could not enroll themselves in the conventional colleges. Apart from self-learning materials and counseling services, IDOL aims to maximize learning opportunities and the first E-learning portal of the North-east, “Bodhiroom” (www.bodhidroom.idolgu.org) developed by IDOL and Radio Luit, the community Radio Centre are latest modes in students support services.

            The first IDOL centre in the district of Sonitpur was established at Darrang College, Tezpur in 2003. At present, there are 2 (two) Examination Centers at Darrang College and Biswanath Charli College and 9 (nine) Contact Centers in the district. Since the beginning, the number of enrollment has been increasing in the district, which is shown by the following table.



Table-2
Enrollment in IDOL Darrang College Centre
Year
2003-04
2006-07

2009-10
2010-11
 Subject
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Assamese
3
13
16
11
28
39
13
51
64
17
54
71
English
6
14
20
1
11
12
9
20
29
11
23
34
Pol. Sc.
8
5
13
6
10
16
28
31
59
34
39
73
Eco
2
2
4
1
10
11
1
4
5
4
7
11
History
0
6
6
1
3
4
9
12
21
12
13
25
Phil
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
3
6
5
7
12
Math
1
1
2
1
3
4
6
0
6
5
0
5
Com.
2
1
3
1
3
4
31
26
57
34
28
62
PGDBM
0
2
2
4
1
5
5
1
6
PGDSMM
1
0
1
18
12
30
16
11
27
Nepali
5
7
12
7
11
18
Bengali
0
2
2
BA-CTS
7
11
18
 Total
22
43
65
23
70
93
127
167
294
157
207
364
Growth
Base Year


43%


352%


460%
Source: IDOL Center, Darrang College, Tezpur.
The above table shows that number of students increase year after year and growth rates of enrollment taking 2003-04 as base year. Females are more interested in distance and open learning course in compare to male. Newly started BA –CTS pass course has a very good enrollment position (18 numbers) in the 1st batch till now. It shows the demand of under-graduate courses like B.A., B. Com., B.B.A, B.C.A. etc. under IDOL, which will reduce the pressure of these courses of Gauhati University under conventional semester system.

Findings:
            The structure-questionnaires are administrated on M.A, M.Com. and MCJ students.  A sample of 30 learners are selected, who had completed their master degree from IDOL Darrang College Center, Tezpur. Analysis of data related to the objectives of the study led the following findings:

(i)     Status of respondent before joining distance courses:
A large percentage (52 percent) of the sample learners are studying in formal schools and colleges and 31 percent are doing regular and part time job. Some of them (3 percent) were self-employed and others (14 percent) are unemployed.
                                                         
(ii)   Reason of learning under distance mode instead of direct mode:
A good numbers (42 percent)of sample learners join IDOL due to insufficient marks to enroll in conventional universities, 21 percent joined IDOL due financial hardship and 25 percent join IDOL due to social reason, specially the women  and only  12 percent due to service.




(iii) Objective to enroll under distance education:
15 percent sample learners’ objective is to continue the learning, a major percentage (54 percent) join the IDOL for getting better job, 12 percent for getting promotion and 19 percent specially women learners for social reasons such as marriage, security, conservative family background etc.

(iv) Prefer IDOL instead of other available distance institutions (IGNOU, KKHOU, etc:
100 percent sample learners prefer IDOL courses because these are more familiar with their degree syllabus.

(v)   The study materials, counseling programmes and online programmes of IDOL :
According to the learners study materials, counseling programmes and online programmes of IDOL are good (80 percent) and medium (20 percent) but not excellent or poor.

(vi) Status of respondent after completion:
22 percent get new job, 17 percent get promotion, 12 percent are self-employed but 49 percent were unemployed after completion of IDOL courses

Suggestions:
The following suggestions are put forwarded for improvement of present scenario of distance education in the district as well as in the state.
(1)   Extended public support in audio-visual media use. Presently, IDOL has access to Radio ‘Luit’ and ‘Bodhidroom’ internet portal . IDOL should start a separate television channel where counseling programmers are available for minimum 4 to 6 hours.
(2)    Priority in using telecommunication facilities: The students and staffs have easy access to telecommunication facilities on priority basis for getting various types of information.
(3)   Proper curriculum design: Some programmes of IDOL states suffering from low enrolment just after two or three year of launching. Proper identification of needs and contexts can lead a good curriculum design that may help the programmes survive.
(4)   Professional honesty: Professional honesty is crucial for the sustainability of IDOL programmes in the evaluation process and in administration. GU authority must monitor and ensure the accountability of its staffs. If any coordination problem arises in the system, authority should resolve it immediately.
(5)   On-time production and delivery of print materials: Delay in production and delivery of study materials discourages students to pursue with the programmes for long. IDOL must ensure on-time production and delivery. The authority has to give extra effort to make all the study packages ready before the session/semester starts.
(6)   Improve the quality of print materials & counseling programme: As per the study, it is found that print materials and counseling programme provided by the IDOL is not sufficient. Some time some print materials can not covered the entire syllabus and revision or updating the study materials is inevitable.
(7)   Continuous Research and Development: Lack of research and development makes DOL programmes very much static and backward as times goes ahead. Therefore research and development cell should be established to pace with the changing environment. Frequent workshop, seminar, discussion, training, etc. should be organized.
(8)   The staffs of the study centers should properly maintain the records and information relating to enrollment, results etc. which are helpful not only to the students but also to the researchers.

Conclusion:
Distance education can cater to the need of higher education in the district as well as in the state has been proved through the study. However, a question still arises: can the system to fulfill the needs and objectives of the learners? Some recent research shows that the degree-holders of the open and distance learning institutions in the developing countries are treated as second-grade degree-holders. But in developing countries learners from DOL get more preference than regular conventional learners. For example learners from UK Open University, London always get preference in Europe than learners from other conventional universities. Because distance learners have to acquire knowledge from different sources at their own and learning with work experience is always have a great demand. Even man like Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela earn various degrees through DOL.  In India, Government has clarified its position in respect of recognition of degrees, earned through the distance mode; for employment under it vide Gazette Notification No. 44 dated 1.3.1995. In spite of this, the quality in education should necessary which reflect the purpose of learners for which they spend their valuable times of their life. Recent introduction of semester system in under-graduate courses by Gauhati University has created a great pressure in enrollment in semester system. Excessive enrollment leads various problems like insufficient physical infrastructure, poor teacher student ratio, which is 1: 150 in some colleges, whereas it is 1: 25 as per UGC and 1:60 as per GU.  Therefore, it can be concluded that distance education is the one and only alternative to solve the problems of higher education in the Country.

References:
1.      Singh K.P. and Ahmed Shakeel, “Higher Education in India: Major Concerns”, University News Vol.49,No.29, July 18-24, 2011.
2.      Swamy Raju Narayana, “Towards an Inclusive Educational System: Role of Distance Education in India”, University News Vol.49, No.42 October 17-23, 2011.
3.      Krishnapillai Murugan, “Academic Leadership in India: Some Reflection in the Context of ODL”, University News Vol. 49, No.48, Nov28-Dec04, 2011.
4.       “What’s the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education”, by  Larry Gold and Christine Maitland, American Federation of Teachers, Washington, DC
6.      Ramaiah Y.R. , “Distance Education and Open Learning”, Chapter-7: Distance Education In India.
7.      Dr. Chakrapani Pushpa, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Open University:Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: Role of ODL in India”
8.      Prospectus of Institute of Distance and Open Learning (IDOL), GU.



Annexure:



Questionnaire
Part-I

  1. Name:
  2. Address: Vill:                                                      PO:                                         City:      
   Dist:                                                    State:                                    Pin:
   Mobile No:
  1. Age:                     yrs
  2. Gender:               Male                      Female               [Put Tick]
  3. Caste: GEN / SC / ST / OBC     [Put Tick]

Part-II
[Put Tick]
  1. Status of respondent before joining distance courses:
(i) Student                                          (ii) Regular/Part time job
(ii) Self-employed                            (iv) Unemployed
  1. Why do you prefer distance learning instead of direct learning:
(i) Lake of sufficient marks                           (ii) Financial problem
(iii) Due to service                                            (iv) Social Reason
  1. Objective to enroll under distance education:
(i) To continue the education                     (ii) to get new/better job:
(iii) To get promotion                                     (iv) Social Reason
  1. Why learners prefer IDOL instead of other available distance courses (IGNOU, KKHOU, etc)
(i) Easy to get marks/ degree                      (ii) More familiar Courses
(iii) Easy to get job                                           (iv) Not specified
  1. Are the study materials, counseling programmes and online programmes of IDOL sufficient:
(i) Excellent                                (ii) Good                              (iii) Medium                       (iv) Poor
  1.  Status of respondent after completion:
(i) New job                                                                         (ii) Promotion                   
(iii) Self-employed                                                           (iv) Unemployed             
  1. Any question deemed to be important for the study:

 [Published in a Journal “Research Promoter” in Vol.III, No. III 2013  [ISSN No. 2231-0193]

No comments:

Post a Comment